by dirty fingers » Fri Nov 15, 2013 4:44 pm
Much better.
But again, GET SOMEONE that is knowledgeable to look at it in hand. On the reverse, it does have traits of machine doubling (flat double image). However, it seems like the machine doubling is from multiple directions, and that simply does not happen (I think).
That is why I wonder if this is not a double(or triple, quadruple, ...) strike, and not just what is classified as 'machine doubling'. Double striking IS considered as an error. A 'normal' machine doubling would look just like the T in ONE CENT. There is a very simple flat T under the T. If you look at only the bottom of the C in ONE CENT. The doubling (machine doubling) seems to come from multiple directions. All of the machine doubling I have ever seen, was all from pretty much 1 direction (it can be up, down, left, right, or rotation), and about the same amount. This seems a little different.
One thing that makes me think double striking, is the reverse, ALONG with the way the rim is on the front (and a little bit in liberty, and a little in the date).
The coin appears to have little wear, and if you can get whatever error there is with it validated, you may have a very nice specimen.
I always take life with a grain of salt, ...plus a slice of lime, ...and a shot of tequila.