coppernickel wrote:April 29, today copper closed at $4.50 a pound making 1 Real Cent worth 3 cents.
It has been creeping up this year. Mark the date.
willy13 wrote:The electric vehicle push is going to require a way larger increase in copper use than silver use.
scyther wrote:It's exciting to see. I don't know if it has ever been 3x face before, but I don't remember seeing it. I stopped sorting years ago but I still have all the copper pennies I got then. They stopped making copper cents in 1982. Maybe after 40 years they'll finally be driven out of circulation.
fasteddy wrote:And if the ^^^^article is correct the cent would increase to nearly $.05 in Cu value...wowzer!
willy13 wrote:The quote from the cnbc article "Copper is the new Oil" is an amazing summation of what is happening with the worlds obsession with electrifying the world. I will go farther and say copper can no longer be called a predicter of an economic boom. Its use will be too important whether the economy is stagnet or booming. Its more than just the copper that goes into electric cars, its the infrastructure that will get that electricity to the cars. There is no other metal that can do it, and the laws of physics can not be changed. I will give an example. Even if we developed a super dense battery that battery would still need to be fed the same amount of electricity. Electric motors are already efficient, it will always take x amount of energy to move a car. Currently 30 min quick chargers use a lot of copper to transfer that energy to the battery. So much energy that some designs have water cooling to keep the copper from over heating. Which means they really should have more copper in them because any heat thats created during the transfer of electricity is energy loss into heat. And if we went with the slow chargers only that are in people homes, we would see the same problem, but at the power stations. When everyone got home at 5:30 pm and plugged there cars in the current draw would me massive, requiring massive amounts of copper or energy would be lost to heat. Battery technologies will change, changing the demand for various metals like lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese. But copper is the only metal that can transfer the energy efficiently. Silvers conductivity is only slightly better than copper and is obviously way more expensive. Aluminum is cheaper but is way less conductive. Aluminum wire would have to be massive in size to transfer the energy needed. It truly is an exciting time for us penny hoarders!
Recyclersteve wrote:willy13 wrote:The quote from the cnbc article "Copper is the new Oil" is an amazing summation of what is happening with the worlds obsession with electrifying the world. I will go farther and say copper can no longer be called a predicter of an economic boom. Its use will be too important whether the economy is stagnet or booming. Its more than just the copper that goes into electric cars, its the infrastructure that will get that electricity to the cars. There is no other metal that can do it, and the laws of physics can not be changed. I will give an example. Even if we developed a super dense battery that battery would still need to be fed the same amount of electricity. Electric motors are already efficient, it will always take x amount of energy to move a car. Currently 30 min quick chargers use a lot of copper to transfer that energy to the battery. So much energy that some designs have water cooling to keep the copper from over heating. Which means they really should have more copper in them because any heat thats created during the transfer of electricity is energy loss into heat. And if we went with the slow chargers only that are in people homes, we would see the same problem, but at the power stations. When everyone got home at 5:30 pm and plugged there cars in the current draw would me massive, requiring massive amounts of copper or energy would be lost to heat. Battery technologies will change, changing the demand for various metals like lithium, nickel, cobalt and manganese. But copper is the only metal that can transfer the energy efficiently. Silvers conductivity is only slightly better than copper and is obviously way more expensive. Aluminum is cheaper but is way less conductive. Aluminum wire would have to be massive in size to transfer the energy needed. It truly is an exciting time for us penny hoarders!
Nice post Willy.
Return to Copper Penny Bullion Investing
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 0 guests