barrytrot wrote:"on the radar" probably means how many people/companies/funds have at least $10 million in the asset.
I would say the number of people/companies/funds with $10 million in cents is probably zero, maybe 1 or 2.
Therefore it doesn't exist to most "eyes".
But, hey, for most people $1 million is still a good deal of cashAnd I'm pretty sure there are a few with close to that.
John_doe wrote:let time get the last laugh. the only problem with their ignorance is a lack of liquidity in the market. they will be crawling back in 50 years or less.
stlouiscoin wrote:barrytrot wrote:"on the radar" probably means how many people/companies/funds have at least $10 million in the asset.
I would say the number of people/companies/funds with $10 million in cents is probably zero, maybe 1 or 2.
Therefore it doesn't exist to most "eyes".
But, hey, for most people $1 million is still a good deal of cashAnd I'm pretty sure there are a few with close to that.
the us mint says that they own all coins and bills, they just "represent" value when citizens how possesion of them. so according to the us mint, they own all copper pennies, as well as all pennies.
So, there is only 1 orginazation that owns over 10 mil in coppers, and there will only be 1
scyther wrote:John_doe wrote:let time get the last laugh. the only problem with their ignorance is a lack of liquidity in the market. they will be crawling back in 50 years or less.
I really hope it doesn't take 50 years...
Derek.Sheriff wrote:I'm persuaded that the US Mint does claim ownership of all coins, it's just that they permit some to be melted while melting other coins is prohibited. Do I have this right?
Lemon Thrower wrote:copper is the red headed step child for good reason.
most people who are into real assets understand the economy. copper is tied to industrial production. we are in a global depression, and the chinese have been stockpiling it for years.. copper may go down in value in the future.
just because its a 'real asset' doesn't mean its a worthwhile specualtion. gravel is a real asset. neither gravel nor copper are precious metals.
Lemon Thrower wrote:there is risk.
i have to pay for storage and wait for the goverment to lift the melt ban. that could be 1-5 years away..now in the mean time silver might triple.
you have a point that the copper will never decline more than 30%, but that does not mean it is the best investment.
AGgressive Metal wrote:Derek.Sheriff wrote:I'm persuaded that the US Mint does claim ownership of all coins, it's just that they permit some to be melted while melting other coins is prohibited. Do I have this right?
There are a variety of things you can't legally destroy without the government necessarily claiming ownership (example: endangered animals). The government claims some unique sovereign powers when it comes to money, but I don't think they go so far as to claim ownership of every coin after they are in circulation.
barrytrot wrote:Depending on how you define risk there is zero with copper cents. "Opportunity cost" is never part of risk.
You "buy" a copper cent for 1 cent it's minimum value is always 1 cent. Zero risk.
ZenOps wrote:Copper is precious enough for me, 16 million tons per year is rarish in my view. If copper were that common, the US, Britain and Canada would still be using it for pennies (disco'ed in 1982, 1991 and 1996 respectively)
Iron is the one that is a true base metal at 2.6 Billion tons per year. Aluminum as well, at 44 million tons per year (but is actually more common than Iron, if the demand and price of aluminum should rise, it could easily be in the billion ton range.)
Just in energy expendature alone, with the exception of Iron - any metal takes at least 90 cents per pound or so (current spot price) or else it starts to become unfeasable to mine. In which case its deflation.
Lemon Thrower wrote:2. storage of copper in meaningful amounts costs money and is out of pocket. portland mint charges you for storage.
Return to Copper Penny Bullion Investing
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests