While I agree that the penny and the nickel do cost more to make than the face value, there are several things that critics of producing a penny fail to acknowledge.
1. Pennies last much longer than a year or two in circulation. We all know that we are still pulling about 25% from circulation that are pre -1982 Copper as well as Wheats and occasionally a Chief.
2. Cost of all coins outside of the penny and nickel, as well as all bills have a considerable face value over cost to produce. In other words, the government makes money when it produces them.
3. We are still using the dollar bill which has a considerably lower shelf life than any coin out there. I find many wheats in a box regularly, dating back to the teens. I cannot tell you the last time I found a dollar older than the late 60"s.
So, if this country wants to do away with the penny.....OK, but then the country should force the dollar coin on the public. I have been overseas and seen the dollar coin work well. The reason it does not work here is two fold. 1.) We did not take bills out of circulation to force it and 2.) there is no two dollar coin. Americans never liked the two dollar bill, so they will not like a two dollar coin unless the only alternative is a heavy pocket full of dollar coins. If we produce a two dollar coin, we now have a place for President Lincoln to flee from the penny.
The penny and the nickel do add up. My boss rounded my billable rate down a nickel to the even dollar and I made him put it back in because over the course of a year, that extra nickel per hour amount to roughly ninety bucks. If you throw away that nickel, you throw away 90 bucks, and if you want to throw it away, throw it my way!
As long as we have the cash/coin system, the penny and the nickel should be made. Just my two cents worth (which will go up to 10 cents if we get rid of the nickel and the penny.

)