More Shields than Copper

I was sorting a box this evening that was giving me more of the new Shield cents than copper cents. I was sure the box was going to be dud. There were already some rolls in there that were not wrapped well and were obviously short. Overall the box was short by 11 coins. When I finished sorting I had 500 Shield cents and 440 copper cents. The copper total is actually pretty close to my average so my copper percentage yield came out quite normal despite all of those Shield cents.
Finding exactly 500 Shield cents was a little strange but I also had exactly 1500 zinc Memorial cents. The rest of the numbers weren't that unusual (9 wheats, 37 - 2009's, and 3 non-U.S.) but all 3 of the non-U.S. coins did come from the same roll (1992 Canada, 2001 Canada, and 2006 China 1 Jiao coin).
Looking just at the Memorial cents and disregarding the rest of the coins, I had 440 of 1940 copper (22.68%) and 1500 of 1940 zinc (77.32%). Over time as more and more new Shield cents are produced the percentage of total Memorial cents per box will decline. But how much change will there be in the copper/zinc ratio of those remaining Memorial cents? Maybe this question is rather pointless sense the overall number of copper cents to be found per box will be declining too. If the yield gets too low it may not be worth the trouble to sort. But I'm curious none the less. Maybe finding a way to rapidly seperate the Shield cents from the Memorial cents will increase sorting efficiency enough to permit sorting at even lower copper yield levels. I went over my sorting stats and came up with 20.49% as the copper percentage of the Memorial cents I have sorted. My sorting history is still too short to tell if there is a slower rate of decline in this percentage versus the decline in the overall copper percentage per box. Are any of you other sorters out there starting to see any trends in these percentages?

Finding exactly 500 Shield cents was a little strange but I also had exactly 1500 zinc Memorial cents. The rest of the numbers weren't that unusual (9 wheats, 37 - 2009's, and 3 non-U.S.) but all 3 of the non-U.S. coins did come from the same roll (1992 Canada, 2001 Canada, and 2006 China 1 Jiao coin).
Looking just at the Memorial cents and disregarding the rest of the coins, I had 440 of 1940 copper (22.68%) and 1500 of 1940 zinc (77.32%). Over time as more and more new Shield cents are produced the percentage of total Memorial cents per box will decline. But how much change will there be in the copper/zinc ratio of those remaining Memorial cents? Maybe this question is rather pointless sense the overall number of copper cents to be found per box will be declining too. If the yield gets too low it may not be worth the trouble to sort. But I'm curious none the less. Maybe finding a way to rapidly seperate the Shield cents from the Memorial cents will increase sorting efficiency enough to permit sorting at even lower copper yield levels. I went over my sorting stats and came up with 20.49% as the copper percentage of the Memorial cents I have sorted. My sorting history is still too short to tell if there is a slower rate of decline in this percentage versus the decline in the overall copper percentage per box. Are any of you other sorters out there starting to see any trends in these percentages?